You are here: Home > News: GRO Digitisation and Indexing (D&I) Project

Link to GENfair website

Visit our online shop for 
books, CDs, fiche, maps, etc.

required to read .pdf documents

pdf files on this site require
Adobe Acrobat Reader
version 6 or later

website designed by
Pete Hunnisett

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid CSS!

all pages on this site
developed to the
above standards

News Index
7 August 2010
Isle of Anglesey RO
29 July 2010
Anglesey Archives
21 July 2010
Dudley Archives
12 April 2010
GRO Certificates
7 April 2010
GRO D&I Project
22 March 2010
Palaeography Chair
11 March 2010
Electoral Register
9 March 2010
News from NLW
9 March 2010
1939 Register
3 March 2010
GRO Fees Increase
14 January 2010
Brighton centre saved
12 January 2010
GRO Digitisation
11 January 2010
TNA News
7 January 2010
New Years Honours
6 January 2010
Certificate Charges

General Register Office (GRO) Digitisation and Indexing (D&I) Project

 

The following link will take you to an update on the IPS/GRO website: http://www.ips.gov.uk/cps/rde/xchg/ips_live/hs.xsl/1090.htm.

I have written to the GRO as follows:

“While I accept that it might be too early to confirm the details, I would like an assurance that the previous promises made by GRO in connection with DoVE and MAGPIE will be carried over to the new project.  I understand that they included the following three items of data from the start of Civil Registration (i.e. the indexes for the Jul-Sep quarter of 1837):

“Indexes of Births: Maiden Surname of Mother - currently only included from the Jul-Sep quarter of 1911 onwards;

“Indexes of Marriages: Surname of Spouse - currently only included from the Jan-Mar quarter of 1912 onwards;

“Indexes of Deaths: Age at Death - currently only included from the Jan-Mar quarter of 1866 until the Jan-Mar quarter of 1949 (after which the date of birth is shown).

“I know from past experience of IT projects that if particular requirements are not set out initially it can be very expensive to incorporate them subsequently and so they are omitted, when inclusion from outset could have been achieved at relatively little extra cost.  It is for this reason that I believe IPS/GRO should be consulting with representatives of users NOW so that the best value for money can be obtained from this project.”

Roger Lewry
FFHS Archives Liaison

7 April 2010